科举到底考什么？一张考卷的千年变化

Page 1

唐代：进士科有诗，也不只有诗

Tang dynasty: The Jinshi Exam Included Poetry, but Not Only Poetry

如果把唐、宋、明、清四个时代的考卷摆在桌上，你可能会以为它们来自四种考试：一张要写诗，一张要解释经典，一张讨论国家事务，还有一张必须按照严格格式写文章。其实，它们都可能属于科举。科举不是一场从古到今都相同的“古代高考”；朝代、考试等级和科目不同，试卷也不同。

先看图中的少年。这是现代画家想象的读书场景，不是一位真实考生留下的记录。我们不知道某个贫穷孩子是否真由缝衣的母亲供读，也不能说他进入长安考场后，第一题一定是写诗。

唐代有许多考试科目。明经科偏重儒家经典，另外还有明法、明算等专门科目，分别考法律或计算知识。最受推崇的进士科也不断变化：早期很重视回答政事问题的“策”，后来诗和赋越来越重要，但经典知识和策问并没有完全消失。

考试诗也不是随心写一首喜欢的诗。它有题目、韵脚和格式等限制，要让考官看见考生熟悉文学传统，也能在压力下组织语言。一首合格的诗需要文采、记忆、判断和技术；策问同样需要写作功夫。把两者说成“诗只考漂亮，策只考思考”，反而看不见两种写作有多难。

Imagine placing four exam papers on a table, one each from the Tang, Song, Ming, and Qing dynasties. One asks for poetry. Another asks the student to explain a classic. A third discusses government, while a fourth demands a tightly controlled essay. They may look like four different tests, yet all could belong to the imperial examination system. The system was not one ancient test that stayed the same forever; its questions depended on the dynasty, exam level, and subject category.

Look at the boy in the picture. This is a modern artist’s imagined study scene, not a record of one real candidate. We do not know that a particular poor boy was supported by a sewing mother, and we cannot say that the first question he saw in Chang’an was always “Write a poem.”

The Tang dynasty had several examination categories. The mingjing category emphasized the Confucian classics. Specialized categories tested subjects such as law and calculation. The admired jinshi exam changed over time. Policy questions were important early on. Poetry and rhyme-prose, called fu, grew more important later, but questions on the classics and government did not simply vanish.

An examination poem was not a chance to write anything you pleased. Its topic, rhyme, and form could all be restricted. A candidate had to show knowledge of a literary tradition and organize language under pressure. A successful poem required memory, judgment, and technique as well as style. A policy response also required careful writing. Saying “poetry tested beauty while policy tested thinking” misses how demanding both forms could be.

Page 2

宋代：换题型，也是在争论怎样选人

Song dynasty: Changing the Question Meant Changing the Kind of Official

到了北宋，进士考试起初仍会考诗赋，也会考论、策和经典知识。1071年，宋神宗时期的王安石推动改革，取消进士科的诗赋考试，改用经义、论和策。经义不是把经书原句抄下来，而是根据题目解释经典的意思；策则要求考生讨论治理问题。

旧故事里那些“黄河决口怎么办”“边境粮食怎么运”的题目很生动，却不是我们查到的真实考题，所以不能装进历史考卷。真正重要的是：改革者认为，新的题型能让考生更认真地理解经典和政治；反对者却担心，评分未必更可靠，新格式也可能很快产生新的套路。后来诗赋一度恢复，考试办法继续变动。

因此，宋代不是从“只会写诗”突然进步到“终于会解决问题”。诗赋、经义和策论都要求阅读、论证与表达，只是训练的重点不同。每当朝廷改变题型，书院里的课程、老师的讲法和考生多年的练习也会跟着改变。

In the early Northern Song, the jinshi examination still included poetry and fu, along with essays, policy responses, and knowledge of the classics. Then, in 1071, reformers led by Wang Anshi changed the system under Emperor Shenzong. Poetry and fu were removed from the jinshi exam, while classical interpretation, essays, and policy responses received new weight. Classical interpretation required a candidate to explain a passage, not merely copy it, while a policy response discussed matters of government.

An older version of this story invented vivid questions about a Yellow River flood, border supplies, and confused taxes. We could not trace those examples to real examination papers, so they do not belong in a historical scene. The real debate is more interesting. Reformers believed the new subjects could lead students toward deeper understanding of the classics and government. Critics worried that judging the answers might not be more reliable and that any new form could soon produce new tricks. Poetry and fu later returned for a time, and the rules continued to shift.

The Song story is not a simple march from “pretty poems” to “real problem-solving.” Poetry, classical interpretation, and policy writing all required reading, argument, and expression, but trained those skills differently. Whenever the court changed the exam, school lessons, teachers’ explanations, and years of student practice had to change with it.

Page 4

号舍里的三天，不是整个科举只有三天

Three Days in a Cell Did Not Mean the Whole System Lasted Three Days

图中的考生坐在狭窄号舍里，身边放着食物和铺盖。这也是现代想象图，不过它抓住了一件真实的事：在明清大型贡院里，许多考生确实在一间间号舍中答题、吃饭和休息，木板可以当桌面，也可以拼成睡铺。

“三天两夜”需要说清楚。以清代会试为例，初九、十二、十五日各开一场，考生通常提前一天入场，后一日交卷离场，所以是每场约三日，而不是整套科举只考三天。乡试和会试通常三年举行一次，考生还要先取得参加上一层考试的资格；通过会试后，才有机会参加皇帝主持名义下的殿试。不同朝代、地区和考试等级的安排并不完全相同，不能把一座贡院的一次经历当成所有科举的样子。

狭窄、天气、疾病和长时间写作都会考验身体。可号舍也提醒我们：考试测到的不只是卷面知识，还会混入家庭能否供读、考生是否有好老师、能否长途赶考，以及身体能否撑过考场等条件。试卷看起来一样，并不表示每个人走到试卷前的路一样长。

In the picture, a candidate sits inside a narrow examination cell with food and bedding nearby. This is another modern imagined scene, but it captures something real. In the great Ming and Qing examination compounds, many candidates did write, eat, and rest in rows of small cells. Wooden boards could serve as a desk and be rearranged into a sleeping platform.

The phrase “three days and two nights” needs an explanation. In a Qing metropolitan examination, for example, the three sessions began on the ninth, twelfth, and fifteenth days of the month. Candidates usually entered a day before each session and left after submitting their work the following day. That made each session about three days. It did not mean that the entire road through the examination system lasted only three days. Provincial and metropolitan exams were normally held on a three-year cycle, and candidates had to earn the right to enter each higher stage. Only after passing the metropolitan examination could they continue to the palace examination. Details varied by dynasty, region, and level.

Cold, heat, sickness, cramped space, and hours of writing could test the body as well as the mind. The cells also remind us of something a paper cannot show. A candidate’s chances depended partly on family support, good teachers, long-distance travel, and the strength to endure the exam. The papers might look the same, but the roads that brought students to them were not equally long.